Energy systematics of heavy nuclei - Mean field models in comparison
Reinhard PG, Agrawal BK (2011)
Publication Type: Journal article
Publication year: 2011
Journal
Book Volume: 20
Pages Range: 1379-1390
Journal Issue: 6
DOI: 10.1142/S0218301311018472
Abstract
We compare the systematics of binding energies computed within the standard and extended versions of the relativistic mean-field (RMF) model and the Skyrme-Hartree-Fock (SHF) model. The general trends for the binding energies for super-heavy nuclei are significantly different for these models. The SHF models tend to underbind the superheavy nuclei, while RMF models show just the opposite trend. The extended RMF model seems to provide remarkable improvements over the results obtained for the standard RMF model. © 2011 World Scientific Publishing Company.
Authors with CRIS profile
Involved external institutions
India (IN)How to cite
APA:
Reinhard, P.-G., & Agrawal, B.K. (2011). Energy systematics of heavy nuclei - Mean field models in comparison. International Journal of Modern Physics E-Nuclear Physics, 20(6), 1379-1390. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301311018472
MLA:
Reinhard, Paul-Gerhard, and B. K. Agrawal. "Energy systematics of heavy nuclei - Mean field models in comparison." International Journal of Modern Physics E-Nuclear Physics 20.6 (2011): 1379-1390.
BibTeX: Download